Re: Part 2 Re: Whatever happened to vulcan-linguistics + question
Rob Zook 
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:39:29 -0600

Saul Epstein wrote:
> 
> (Quotes Rob Zook: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 1:10 PM)
> 
> >Labguage represents thought's vehical for communication. Speaking in
> >words to oneself (that constant internal dialog with one's selves
> that
> >most humans have), influences futher thought. Therefore adding
> certain
> >discplines to the grammar of a language, also adds those disciplines
> >to thought.
> 
> We've had this discussion before, and reached a state of disagreement
> involving two modes of speech that I find satisfactory. I cannot help
> but feel that aspects of the Formal mode as you conceive it aren't
> sustainable even as a partly artificial language, but I'll quit
> pointing that out.

No, please go right ahead and keep pointing it out. If you can put it
in such a way that I finally understand your point of view, I might
actually agree with you.


Rob Z.