Re: Part 2 Re: Whatever happened to vulcan-linguistics + question
Saul Epstein 
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:59:53 -0600

(Quotes Rob Zook: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 1:10 PM)


>Labguage represents thought's vehical for communication. Speaking in
>words to oneself (that constant internal dialog with one's selves
that
>most humans have), influences futher thought. Therefore adding
certain
>discplines to the grammar of a language, also adds those disciplines
>to thought.


We've had this discussion before, and reached a state of disagreement
involving two modes of speech that I find satisfactory. I cannot help
but feel that aspects of the Formal mode as you conceive it aren't
sustainable even as a partly artificial language, but I'll quit
pointing that out.

--
from Saul Epstein
locus*planetkc,com - www,planetkc,com/locus
"Surakri' ow'phatsur the's'hi the's'tca'; the's'pharka
    the's'hi suraketca'."
                                        -- K'dvarin Urswhl'at