Re: Part 1 Re: Whatever happened to vulcan-linguistics + question
Whittaker, Pat 
Tue, 26 Jan 99 11:38:00 M


I would be interested in learning MV, however, my knowledge base is so 
incredibly small that once the linguistic terms come into play, I'm dead in 
the water as I don't understand them.  You might as well be speaking Klingon 
to me.  But, I'm willing.....

Selek
 ----------
From: owner-vulcan-linguistics
To: vulcan-linguistics
Subject: Re: Part 1 Re: Whatever happened to vulcan-linguistics + question
Date: Tuesday, 26 January, 1999 5:54PM

On the subject of Modern Vulcan, Saul Epstein wrote:

> I'd like to propose the following, just for consideration. Let's
> combine all the piecemeal additions that have been put forward with a
> re-transcribed and clarified version of our source lexicon. (Just the
> more "word-like" additions by the way. All our various affix particles
> probably belong in any finished lexicon, but they're so dependent on
> the way the grammar turns out that I'd like to wait.)
>
> We can label this a draft of a second edition of the lexicon, and work
> on adding words generated by Rob's program, and borrowings from OHV.
> It would remain a draft until such time as Marketa has a chance to
> review and approve some version as the definitive second edition.
>
> What do others think?