Re: Part 1 Re: Whatever happened to vulcan-linguistics + question
Dr Maggie Hellstrom, Lund University 
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:54:23 +0100 (MET)

On the subject of Modern Vulcan, Saul Epstein wrote:
 
> I'd like to propose the following, just for consideration. Let's
> combine all the piecemeal additions that have been put forward with a
> re-transcribed and clarified version of our source lexicon. (Just the
> more "word-like" additions by the way. All our various affix particles
> probably belong in any finished lexicon, but they're so dependent on
> the way the grammar turns out that I'd like to wait.)
> 
> We can label this a draft of a second edition of the lexicon, and work
> on adding words generated by Rob's program, and borrowings from OHV.
> It would remain a draft until such time as Marketa has a chance to
> review and approve some version as the definitive second edition.
> 
> What do others think?

I find this an excellent suggestion! I would really like to start
learning MV, but without words (and plenty of examples!) I won't
get anywhere...

Dr. Maggie
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ah!" he exclaimed. "I see!" But that was before I turned off the light.