Re: Zvelebil/Epstein/McReynold Comparison Saul Epstein Fri, 10 Jul 1998 16:49:04 -0500 Quotes from: Rob Zook Date: Friday, July 10, 1998 3:26 PM >Original Brit >Zvelebil: Epstein: Zook: Reynolds: English: also: ch tc ? ch church >Saul, if you've revised your system, please repost the thing in it's >entirety. Not everyone may have kept up with all those posts. I just >posted the orginal, as I remember it. I haven't revised it beyond abandoning the extra vowels. You remember it accurately as far as I can tell, and I'll be going through it all in a future post to explain its motivations. Incidentally, to further confuse matters, I can see a lot of possibility in the direction of some of Ryan's suggestions. Especially, if we use and for the sounds in "church" and "judge" respectively, that eliminates one of the two-character signs () and one of the three-character signs (). Also, if we follow the logic of for /x/, we could use for /f/, freeing to represent the voiceless W (currently at ) and thereby eliminating the other three-character sign () by replacing it with ... -- from Saul Epstein locus*planetkc,com - www,planetkc,com/locus "Surakri' ow'patsur the's'hi the's'ca'; the's'parka the's'hi surakeca'." -- K'dvarin Ursfl'at